IntroHomeIs It For You?Getting StartedResultsFinancialLocation/TravelResearch/VeterinaryMedical BasisResourcesIn the NewsInvestorsAbout UsContact Us

We don't take credit for our cancer results.  We give thanks for them.
The latest
Here are just a few of our most recent outcomes:
>  Ongoing partial response leading to complete response in a patient with mucinous adenocarcinoma, now 29 months and counting of progression-free survival, in excellent health and working full time
>  Ongoing disease-free survival (now 27 months and counting) in a patient with metastatic ovarian cancer, healthy and active
>  Complete response and continuing disease-free survival, now 16 months and counting, in a patient with locally advanced breast cancer
>  7.5 years and counting of disease-free survival in a patient with resected stage 3 colon cancer, in excellent health and working full time
>  6.5 years and counting of disease-free survival in a patient with both renal cell cancer and a highly aggressive multiply recurring lung cancer, in excellent health and working full time
>  Complete response and ongoing disease-free survival in a patient with widely metastatic stage 4 follicular B-cell lymphoma, in excellent health and working full time
>  Three years and counting of disease-free survival in a patient with previously aggressive and multiply recurring stage 3 melanoma, in excellent health and working full time
>  Continuing partial response in a patient with advanced follicular B-cell lymphoma, after failing treatment at a major national cancer center, now fourteen months and counting of progression-free survival
Cumulative results and a special note on mesothelioma and pancreatic cancer
There can be nothing more gratifying to us than to see our patients beating the odds.  While we cannot help every patient, so far we have been able to see the great majority of our patients do significantly better than with previously available treatments.  If that ever changes we will close our doors.
It is important for patients evaluating these results to note several things.  First, these are from a relatively small number of patients so far and because of that they are not "statistically significant," that is, they do not come from a large enough group of patients to confidently predict future outcomes.  We're still very new and we're steadily building toward larger numbers.  Second, these data are not yet from controlled clinical trials, the next essential phase of this work.  Currently this is simply an off-label treatment offered in our independent medical practice which is very similar to a phase II clinical trial but accepts patients who wouldn't be able to qualify for most formal trials.  So while we are very thankful for these results and pleased to be able to share them, they do not constitute controlled clinical data and we do not represent them as such.  Having said those things, we're happy to share exactly how we're doing.
Please note several definitions and parameters.  First, these outcomes also include our patients with stage 4 and late stage 3 cancers, which many trials won't include because of their much lower chance for successful treatment.  Second, we have defined successful outcomes as either complete response (no evidence of remaining cancer), partial response (significant reduction in size or volume of tumors), or stable disease (no significant increase or decrease in tumor mass, and no new metastases) using the standardized criteria of the World Health Organization and RECIST.  This method and definition is also equivalent to the terms "disease control rate" and "clinical benefit ratio" which you may see in many cancer publications.  Patients with an initial ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 are eligible for inclusion.  We do not include patients who do not follow the treatment program for at least eight full weeks or who do not return for at least an initial follow-up visit.  In summary, these results include all patients who meet criteria typical for clinical trials, although for the sake of honesty we also include unsuccessful outcomes from patients who did not return for follow-up but whom we believe followed the treatment program and had apparent disease progression by radiologic evidence.

As of early February 2020, our successful outcome rates have been as follows.
Malignant melanoma      All patients, 85.0% (17 of 20)  /   Patients with stage 4 or 3c
       disease, 82.4% (14 of 17)
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma     86.7% (13 of 15) (all patients stage 4 or extensive stage 3)
Colon & rectal cancer also including mucinous adenocarcinoma/"PMP"
       All patients, 78.9% (15 of 19)  /   Patients with stage 3 or 4 disease, 77.8% (14 of 18)
Sarcomas, all types combined    71.4% (10 of 14)
Breast cancer (all types)    87.5% (7 of 8)
All diagnoses (these and others) combined     83.9% (94 of 112)
Two patients have experienced progression of pancreatic cancer while in the first few months of treatment.  In one the large primary tumor was significantly reduced at two months and gone at four months, but pulmonary metastases continued to grow slowly.  There were no new sites of metastatic disease.  In the second individual there was continued slow progression of liver metastases but no new metastatic disease.  Three melanoma patients reported as failure of treatment above had limited progression which still represented a substantially better outcome than what was expected and had been experienced on previous treatment.
Successful responses have also been achieved in the majority of patients evaluated so far with breast cancer (6 of 7 patients, including triple receptor negative and widely metastatic stage 4) and all our patients with renal (kidney) carcinoma (1 patient), ovarian cancer (3 patients), rhabdomyosarcoma (2 patients), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (2 patients), desmoplastic small round cell tumor (1 patient), mesothelioma (2 patients; see additional note below), prostate cancer (2 patients), hepatocellular carcinoma (1 patient, also with hepatitis C), carcinoid syndrome (1 patient), squamous cell carcinoma (3 patients, head & neck region), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (4 patients), pancreatic neuroendocrine (islet cell) cancer (1 patient), non-small-cell lung cancer (1 patient), vulvar cancer (1 patient, squamous cell type), adenoid cystic carcinoma (1 patient), and several others.  Some of these patients were not even in sufficient health at the beginning of treatment to meet the criteria for inclusion in the reportable statistics above but had excellent response to treatment anyway.
Excellent responses are accruing for our patients with lymphoma as well, especially in the last eighteen months.  Many additional patients with varied diagnoses are currently in treatment, and these results will be updated periodically as information becomes available.
Four trends are becoming very clear even in this early experience.  First, there has been a dramatically lower incidence of new distant metastases in patients using this treatment program (not a statistically significant finding at present), suggesting that it may have potential to prevent or inhibit seeding of new metastases.  Thus the treatment may have its greatest benefit if instituted before too much time has passed and cancer has spread to distant sites, some of which could be more resistant to treatment.  Second, it appears that this treatment has a significant capacity to enlist the immune system to hold malignancies in check even when not actively regressing.  Because of this, many of our patients who achieve only stable disease in fact have such remarkable stability that they become eligible for surgical resection of nicely contained tumors and go on to very prolonged active and healthy survival, often with no further evidence of disease.  Third, the rate of progression of disease has been significantly reduced even in most patients for whom disease control could not be achieved.  This is also translating into longer overall survival, and since side effects of this treatment regimen tend to be very tolerable, this could mean more enjoyable quality time with family and loved ones.  Finally, patients whose overall health has been extensively debilitated by either cancer progression or cytotoxic treatments have far less chance of a successful outcome.  Therefore, patients for whom our treatment program is a viable option may have better chances if it begins earlier while overall health is still good.  These observations are not from a large enough group of patients to be statistically significant and do not constitute outcome data from controlled clinical trials.
Occasionally we encounter physicians or patients who wonder if this kind of success could even be real.  It's real, and our steadily growing group of long term survivors attest to that.  We hope that this honest information, even though preliminary, can be helpful to you.
Mesothelioma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma
We are experiencing a trend in mesothelioma treatment which, though far too preliminary for any conclusions, may be extremely useful to patients and families dealing with this universally progressive and fatal diagnosis.  Our first two patients with pleural mesothelioma who have undergone treatment with this technique and Alimta (pemetrexed) concurrently have both experienced dramatic tumor regression and improvement in clinical status and performance.  We do not yet know whether similar results could have been achieved without pemetrexed.  No statistically valid conclusions can be drawn from these results because of the small numbers, but given the unprecedented success of treatment in these patients and the tolerability of the regimen, mesothelioma patients may wish to give consideration to this possibility.  Benefit to the patient can usually be evaluated within two months from start of combined treatment.  Individuals considering this treatment should understand that we do not recommend forgoing other appropriate treatments, and we strongly recommend surgical resection of cancer whenever feasible and to the greatest extent possible.
A similar phenomenon is emerging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.  Our first few patients demonstrated a mix of remarkable responses and impressive early stability of disease.  Several did develop some treatment resistance after long periods of healthy stability, though progression of disease was still generally at a much slower pace than with typical indicated therapy.  Therefore outcomes tended to be better with this regimen in several meaningful ways.  However more recently we have been able to achieve even better outcomes with a carefully monitored and tailored combination of this regimen with cytotoxic agents (specifically gemcitabine and capecitabine above others).  The outcomes for all these patients are grouped together on this page since numbers are still small, but this latter approach is producing more impressive outcomes and is now our preferred approach pending proper confirmatory trials.  We emphasize once again that these results are not from controlled clinical trials and are not statistically significant.

NeoPlas Innovation -- oncology answers you can live with.